Dlever_os
--:--

Technologydlever

Custom systems

There is almost always a platform that solves a good part of the problem, and when there is, we use it. We build custom when none fits: the process is unique, the integration doesn't exist or forcing a standard tool costs more than building the piece.

00The need

Sometimes no platform fits: the process is unique, the integration you need doesn't exist or adapting a standard tool would cost more than building the piece. Then it's time to build, and to do it in a way that lasts for years.

A good fit if…

  • No standard tool fits your process
  • You need an integration that doesn't exist
  • Adapting a platform would cost more than building

01When building is needed

Building is not the starting point: it is what remains when the platform doesn't have the answer.

A standard platformA custom system
  1. WhenIf it solves a good part of the problem
  2. The processIt adapts to the tool
  3. The integrationWhatever the platform already offers
  4. The costLower, as long as the platform works
  1. WhenIf no platform fits
  2. The processIt is unique, and the system is built to fit it
  3. The integrationWhatever is needed, even if it doesn't exist
  4. The costLower, when forcing it costs more

Key idea

It is designed to grow in parts, not to be rewritten from scratch in two years.

02From design to production

The same path for every system, and it ends in maintenance: what we build is not delivered and abandoned.

  1. Interface design in Figma

    To validate how it is used before writing a single line of code.

    ServiceSystems design

  2. Modular architecture

    Designed to grow in parts, with one piece for each job.

    ServiceSystems design

  3. Build and deployment

    The system is built in parts and goes into production once each one has been tested.

    ServiceSystems design

  4. Evolutionary maintenance

    What we build is reviewed and evolves as operations change.

    ServiceEvolutionary maintenance

Key idea

We design before coding, not while coding.

03Who runs it afterwards

That is decided by the engagement model, not the architecture: the same system works for all three.

  • By your team

    Your team

    With documentation and handover included in the delivery.

  • In your environment

    Us, in your environment

    We maintain and evolve it on your infrastructure.

  • In our environment

    Us, in ours

    We run it in an environment managed by us.

Key idea

The same system, three ways to keep it running.

04What we build with

The main pieces we build with. Which language goes into each system depends on the case.

Key idea

Few pieces, well chosen: just enough for the system to last for years.

First step

We come to your offices to learn about your case

No cost, no commitment, and no catalog presentation. We see the process where it happens and talk with the people who run it. You come away with a reading of your situation and a first prioritization.

Request a visit